Editor assigned after reviews completed springer

The rescheduling algorithm described in Section 3.3 was applied to the General Surgery operations and sessions and a time step of one week was used. The values of the parameter υ, which determines the maximum allowed probability of overtime, were 0.5, 0.4, 0.3, 0.2, and 0.1.Each of these values of υ was combined with three values for the parameter λ, which is the exponent applied to the ...Background <p>Triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) are associated with an aggressive clinical course, earlier recurrence and short survival. <i>BRCA</i> - mutated tumours represent up to 25% of all TNBC. <i>BRCA</i> status is being studied as a predictive biomarker of response to platinum agents. However, the predictive role of <i>BRCA</i> status is still uncertain in this setting. Since ...The status "Editor Assigned" means that your paper has been assigned to an Associate Editor (AE) who will be in charge of it. The AE will do an initial screening of the manuscript to check its overall scientific value and match with the scope of the paper, after which the paper will either receive a desk rejection or be sent for peer review.The last time I submitted to a Springer journal, it took about two to three months before being assigned to an editor and a full ten months post submission before I received feedback from the reviewers. According to my supervisors this was not an unusual amount of time to wait. 6 lucaxx85 • 6 yr. ago With global development, companies need to seek opportunities for improvement and act accordingly to ensure the optimization of industrial production processes. Companies also try to ensure the quality of the final product, reducing process costs to increase the...These reviews were essentially empty reviews as they did not identify any studies that met all of their inclusion criteria. Another review of comprehensive interventions designed to reduce gang-related crime was conducted by the Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre, 2009). This also focused on high-16 The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted how low public trust and understanding of vaccine research has led to vaccine hesitancy 1.In turn, hesitancy has contributed to suboptimal vaccination rates ...Purpose of Review <p>The main surgical treatment for invasive malignant melanoma consists of wide surgical and examination of the sentinel node and in selected cases complete lymph node dissection. The aim of this review is to present data for the optimal surgical management of patients with malignant melanoma.</p> Recent Findings <p>A surgical excision margin of 1–2 cm is recommended for ...Nov 18, 2022 · Purpose High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy was noninferior to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for preventing reintubation in a heterogeneous population at high-risk for extubation failure. However, outcomes might differ in certain subgroups of patients. Thus, we aimed to determine whether NIV with active humidification is superior to HFNC in preventing reintubation in patients with ... “all basics that are wrong with the current concept of time crystal: learning from the polyatomic time crystals of protein, microtubule, and neuron,” in proceedings of trends in electronics and health informatics, lecture notes in networks and systems, edited by m. s. kaiser, a. bandyopadhyay, k. ray, r. singh, and v. nagar (springer, 2022), vol. … responsive carouselExperienced associate Professor with a demonstrated history of working in the researches about health. Skilled in Physical Therapy,cardiopulmonary disorders,geriatrics , rehabilitation and nursing.Have an experience in working as an editor and reviewer for more than 12 years in reputable journals ,and famous publishers such as Springer nature ,Taylor and Francis,Mark Allen,Lippincott Williams ...Skilled in Physical Therapy,cardiopulmonary disorders,geriatrics , rehabilitation and nursing.Have an experience in working as an editor and reviewer for more than 12 years in reputable journals...From its extraction through sale, use and disposal, all the stuff in our lives affects communities at home and abroad, yet most of this is hidden from view. ... Depending on which editor is used, the procedure is slightly different. We have created a summary of how to proceed if you want to use Visual Studio Code, CLion or QT Creator to start PupilEXT (see the below option 1 to 4). Option 1: Build with Visual Studio Code. First, the following extensions must be downloaded in the editor for the ...The aim of this paper is to review the role of different pharmacologic agents used for the treatment of GD, in order to help guide clinical decisions according to latest data. ... (ten of them completed the study) with a mean dose of fluvoxamine of 195 mg/day versus placebo. ... randomly assigned to a therapy with amantadine 200 mg/day or ...Background Polypharmacy can decrease medication adherence and increase the incidence of adverse drug reactions and drug-drug interactions, resulting in falls, hospitalisations and other complications especially in the elderly. Medication-related problems of polypharmacy can be prevented through patient-centred medication reviews but research in this area has been completed largely without ...Jul 18, 2019 · Answer: The status “reviews completed” indicates that peer reviewers have finished evaluating your manuscript and the review reports have been sent to the journal. It seems that the journal uses “Editor assigned” whenever that the manuscript is with the Associate Editor (AE). Web what is spectrum dns server Apr 12, 2022 ... The status changes to Required Reviews Completed. · Assigned editors may receive an email notice of the status change. · The submission can be ...Answer: Hello, After the review process, editor is assigned to check the quality of the paper and the reviewers comments. Usually, an article being assigened to an editor after review is a good thing. If there was going to be a rejection, after the reviewers grading, your article would have been rejected. You must have received positive reviews.Web2. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. 3. Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center. Question. 1. 1. Understanding Task Requirements and Instructions. The first tip is to read and understand the assignment’s instructions by identifying the topic and the limiting words, which are the key attributes. It helps with analysis, discussion, and evaluations whilst also enabling clearer summaries. The analysis part should explore and clearly ...Web blue heaven black ensemble theater Aquatic Ecology covers the ecology of fresh, brackish, estuarine and marine environments. The journal presents timely reports on fundamental and applied research in the field and the laboratory. It provides a forum for aquatic ecologists to address and evaluate ecological issues related to processes and structures at different integration levels.Agreed, this can mean under review by an editor after the peer review has been completed. Now It has been changed from "Reviews assigned" to "Under review"! It means new reviewers started to review the paper! After more than 3 months!! 6 years ago Z Zutterfly 279 posts Quote From Mech: Quote From TreeofLife:Answer: Hello, After the review process, editor is assigned to check the quality of the paper and the reviewers comments. Usually, an article being assigened to an editor after review is a good thing. If there was going to be a rejection, after the reviewers grading, your article would have been rejected. You must have received positive reviews. 8 ball pool googleIt may just be that the status changes each time the paper gets passed to a reviewer (e.g. the editor gives it to reviewer #1, reviewer #1 gives it back to editor, editor gives it to reviewer #2, and so on). The time it takes to fully review a paper ranges depending on the journal but typically the process takes several months.I submitted a manuscript to Springer Journal. After several weeks I received an email saying that"Based on the advice received, the Editor feels that your manuscript could be accepted for publication should you be prepared to incorporate minor revisions". After incorporating the comments of reviewers, I resubmitted the paper.Stage 2: Editor assigned. Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience and apparent conflicts of interest.I submitted a review paper to a Springer-based journal. The various status updates are as follows. July 1: I made the initial submission. August 12: The status changed to Under Review. September 4: The status changed to Reviews Completed. September 15: I received a major revision decision. October 5: I submitted the revised manuscript.WebAug 01, 2022 · What does "Reviews Completed" status mean in Springer? publications journals peer-review journal-workflow 24,373 It's waiting for the editor to read the reviews and make a decision. This could mean one of the following: 'reject', 'submit as new', 'major revision, 'minor revision' or 'accept' (Depending on the journal, options may change). Webrelated to this experimental course in the form of review and then explained the exper-imental content, steps and methods, and then the students did their own experiments. The disadvantage is that the explanation takes up a lot of time, which greatly shortens the time for students to conduct experiments by themselves and cannot extend in depth.Editor assignment pending after "review competed". publications journals journal-workflow. 12,896. It's not certain what it means without knowing the particulars of the journal's internal handling, but a likely meaning is that the paper has been handed off from the associate editor who has been handling the reviewing to a senior editor to ... bmw n20 high mileage Jan 15, 2017 · Each journal has its specific take, but the most likely explanation is that the peer review process took longer than usual and the same editor had expired and had to be reassigned, or that he was no longer interested in handling your manuscript and it was thus assigned to another editor. WebWebMain job details: JOB TYPE: Editing (Monolingual review) TARGET LANGUAGE: Dutch SOURCE WORD COUNT: See attached DEADLINE: November 16, 6 pm UK time RATE PER WORD: 0.015$ DELIVERY FILE FORMAT: Word file with track changes NOTES: NUMBER OF DOCUMENTS FOR REVIEW: 1 REFERENCE FILES: 0 NUMBER AND DATE FORMAT: NL Instructions: Perform Monolingual review of the text by using track changes and if any ...Nature is a British weekly scientific journal founded and based in London, England. As a multidisciplinary publication, Nature features peer-reviewed research from a variety of academic disciplines, mainly in science and technology. It has core editorial offices across the United States, continental Europe, and Asia under the international ...Depending on which editor is used, the procedure is slightly different. We have created a summary of how to proceed if you want to use Visual Studio Code, CLion or QT Creator to start PupilEXT (see the below option 1 to 4). Option 1: Build with Visual Studio Code. First, the following extensions must be downloaded in the editor for the ...The Ed. reviews it & forwards it to the Ed. Board (who happen to have a meeting that very day). The Ed. Board see your paper, agree it is impeccable & reach a rapid consensus to publish the... It means exactly what it says on the tin: that the editor has looked at your submission and decided that it is not productive to involve reviewers. This is ...Web used remodeled campers for sale near virginia You are likely in a similar situation. I have submitted to a journal where "editor assignment pending" meant assignment of reviewers by the editor was pending, not that the assignment of an editor at all was pending. And it can definitely take 20 days to find three people willing to review a paper. WebEach journal has its specific take, but the most likely explanation is that the peer review process took longer than usual and the same editor had expired and had to be reassigned, or that he was no longer interested in handling your manuscript and it was thus assigned to another editor.After 4 months, plasma levels of triglycerides, VLDL cholesterol, remnant cholesterol and apolipoprotein C-III were reduced by 26.2%, 25.8%, 25.6% and 27.6% with pemafibrate treatment compared ...Web how to ask your uncle for something related to this experimental course in the form of review and then explained the exper-imental content, steps and methods, and then the students did their own experiments. The disadvantage is that the explanation takes up a lot of time, which greatly shortens the time for students to conduct experiments by themselves and cannot extend in depth.WebAug 11, 2021 ... After a manuscript is submitted to a target journal, it undergoes peer review. However, several steps occur that often only the corresponding ..."Assigned to editor" means the manuscript is under the disposal of the editor. The editor usually initially evaluates the manuscript, selects the appropriate reviewer and sends it to the...Medication-related problems of polypharmacy can be prevented through patient-centred medication reviews but research in this area has been completed largely without examining patients’ viewpoints. Objective The aim was to investigate patient views about a clinical pharmacist-led patient-centred polypharmacy medication review service completed ...It may just be that the status changes each time the paper gets passed to a reviewer (e.g. the editor gives it to reviewer #1, reviewer #1 gives it back to editor, editor gives it to reviewer #2, and so on). The time it takes to fully review a paper ranges depending on the journal but typically the process takes several months.WebFifty Alzheimer's disease patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either receive precuneus or sham rTMS (mean age 73.7 years; 52% female). ... (90%) completed the treatment period . On average, the mean number of rTMS sessions completed for 24 weeks did not vary between patients allocated to either experimental group (PC-rTMS: 30.2 ...Day 01 Questions 1. Which of the following command used to open system properties? a. Sysdm.cpl b. Sconfig.cmd c. Ncpa.cpl d. Sysdm.cmd 2. Which of the following command is used to open network connections? a. Sysdm.cpl b. Ncpa.cpl c. Ncpa.cmd d. None of the above 3. What is a computer program that provides a service to another computer program? a. Server b. Data Center c. Operating System d ...Web is nuclear energy more expensive Medication-related problems of polypharmacy can be prevented through patient-centred medication reviews but research in this area has been completed largely without examining patients’ viewpoints. Objective The aim was to investigate patient views about a clinical pharmacist-led patient-centred polypharmacy medication review service completed ...A typical retailer carries 10,000 stock-keeping units (SKUs). However, these numbers may exceed hundreds of millions for giants such as Walmart and Amazon. Besides the volume, SKU data can also be high-dimensional, which means that SKUs can be segmented on the basis of various attributes. Given the data volumes and the multitude of potentially important dimensions to consider, it becomes ...algorithms-15-00202-v2 - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free.Purpose of Review <p>The main surgical treatment for invasive malignant melanoma consists of wide surgical and examination of the sentinel node and in selected cases complete lymph node dissection. The aim of this review is to present data for the optimal surgical management of patients with malignant melanoma.</p> Recent Findings <p>A surgical excision margin of 1–2 cm is recommended for ...WebAfter 4 months, plasma levels of triglycerides, VLDL cholesterol, remnant cholesterol and apolipoprotein C-III were reduced by 26.2%, 25.8%, 25.6% and 27.6% with pemafibrate treatment compared ...These reviews were essentially empty reviews as they did not identify any studies that met all of their inclusion criteria. Another review of comprehensive interventions designed to reduce gang-related crime was conducted by the Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre, 2009). This also focused on high-16 basketball stars 1 I submitted a review paper to a Springer-based journal. The various status updates are as follows. July 1: I made the initial submission. August 12: The status changed to Under Review. September 4: The status changed to Reviews Completed. September 15: I received a major revision decision. October 5: I submitted the revised manuscript.The last time I submitted to a Springer journal, it took about two to three months before being assigned to an editor and a full ten months post submission before I received feedback from the reviewers. According to my supervisors this was not an unusual amount of time to wait. 6 lucaxx85 • 6 yr. agoSept 16, 2021 ... However, there are often 2−3 editors sequentially assigned to your paper, and this timeframe may apply to each of them. Therefore, if your ...Aquatic Ecology covers the ecology of fresh, brackish, estuarine and marine environments. The journal presents timely reports on fundamental and applied research in the field and the laboratory. It provides a forum for aquatic ecologists to address and evaluate ecological issues related to processes and structures at different integration levels.① Editor assigned 编辑指派. ② Editor Declined Invitation 该编辑拒绝邀请,这就会让主编不得不将投稿文章重新分派给其它编辑。 ③Decision Letter Being Prepared 就是编辑没找审稿人就自己决定了,一般情况下比较悲剧。一可能是英文太差,需要语言润色。二可能是内容太差。The Ed. reviews it & forwards it to the Ed. Board (who happen to have a meeting that very day). The Ed. Board see your paper, agree it is impeccable & reach a rapid consensus to publish the... The last time I submitted to a Springer journal, it took about two to three months before being assigned to an editor and a full ten months post submission before I received feedback from the reviewers. According to my supervisors this was not an unusual amount of time to wait. 6 lucaxx85 • 6 yr. ago minotaur chest key grounded Further analysis of the pseudochromosome assembly revealed 97% complete and 2.5% duplicated Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCOs) (Table S2), suggesting the genome is fairly complete. Genome annotation revealed 32 563 gene models and also identified 46.11% of the genome as transposable elements (TEs) (Tables S4 and S5).It may just be that the status changes each time the paper gets passed to a reviewer (e.g. the editor gives it to reviewer #1, reviewer #1 gives it back to editor, editor gives it to reviewer #2, and so on). The time it takes to fully review a paper ranges depending on the journal but typically the process takes several months.WebDay 01 Questions 1. Which of the following command used to open system properties? a. Sysdm.cpl b. Sconfig.cmd c. Ncpa.cpl d. Sysdm.cmd 2. Which of the following command is used to open network connections? a. Sysdm.cpl b. Ncpa.cpl c. Ncpa.cmd d. None of the above 3. What is a computer program that provides a service to another computer program? a. Server b. Data Center c. Operating System d ...Jul 04, 2016 · Since Springer has a rigorous peer review system, it would take from 4 to 7 months but there are some articles in Water Resource Management published even after 1 year. Cite Popular answers (1) Jan 31, 2008 ... I felt that editors and referees should recall that a scientific paper ... reviews within a mean time of 11 days after agreeing to review.algorithms-15-00202-v2 - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free.2. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. 3. Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center. Question. 1. Mar 06, 2020 · Editor of manuscript assigned after reviews were completed. paper-submission journal-workflow. 1,531. Each journal has its specific take, but the most likely explanation is that the peer review process took longer than usual and the same editor had expired and had to be reassigned, or that he was no longer interested in handling your manuscript ... The various status updates are as follows.July 1: I made the initial submission.August 12: The status changed to Under Review.September 4: The status changed to Reviews Completed.September 15: I received a major revision decision.October 5: I submitted the revised manuscript.October 25: The status changed to Under Review.October 25: The date changed, but the status remained unchanged (Under Review).November 2: The status changed to Reviews Completed.November 8: The status has changed to ...Jun 27, 2015 · I submitted a paper to one of the Springer Journals through Editorial Manager almost 5 months back. The status changed from Editor Assigned to Under Review and now it is showing "Reviews Completed" since past five days. Can anybody suggest what does it actually mean and is there any other stage before the decision is made? Pemafibrate, a selective PPARα modulator, lowers plasma triglyceride levels but does not reduce the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients already treated with optimal statin ...related to this experimental course in the form of review and then explained the exper-imental content, steps and methods, and then the students did their own experiments. The disadvantage is that the explanation takes up a lot of time, which greatly shortens the time for students to conduct experiments by themselves and cannot extend in depth.Nov 08, 2022 · Aquatic Ecology covers the ecology of fresh, brackish, estuarine and marine environments. The journal presents timely reports on fundamental and applied research in the field and the laboratory. It provides a forum for aquatic ecologists to address and evaluate ecological issues related to processes and structures at different integration levels. Participate fully in account review and brainstorming meetings; Provide an advanced level of scientific advice to relevant account teams: Strategy and tactics (e.g. program development for meetings, new ideas for publications including congress presentations, papers, new analyses, and reviews) New opportunitiesThe COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted how low public trust and understanding of vaccine research has led to vaccine hesitancy 1.In turn, hesitancy has contributed to suboptimal vaccination rates ...The aim of this paper is to review the role of different pharmacologic agents used for the treatment of GD, in order to help guide clinical decisions according to latest data. ... (ten of them completed the study) with a mean dose of fluvoxamine of 195 mg/day versus placebo. ... randomly assigned to a therapy with amantadine 200 mg/day or ...Nov 14, 2022 · We denote the sessions completed and operations performed in the time between points 1 and 2 as K 1 = {s ∈ S 1: b s ≤ τ 2} and P 1 = {o ∈ O 1: x ˆ o, s 1 = 1 ∧ s ∈ K 1}. Note that this assumes that all of the operations assigned to each session are completed, and are never cancelled due to the session running overtime or to enable ... If the status of the manuscript shifted after the peer review to “with editor” or “editor assigned,” it means that the manuscript was returned to the Associate Editor, who will peruse... It depends on the editorial board of springer journal and the reviewers they choose to review the paper. Generally, the first answer is between 1 month to 6 months Cite 17th Jul, 2018 Virendra...Persuasion Map - ReadWriteThinkMedication-related problems of polypharmacy can be prevented through patient-centred medication reviews but research in this area has been completed largely without examining patients’ viewpoints. Objective The aim was to investigate patient views about a clinical pharmacist-led patient-centred polypharmacy medication review service completed ... match violation sdn Nov 15, 2022 · Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal. search menu Journals Active Journals WebIf the status of the manuscript shifted after the peer review to "with editor" or "editor assigned," it means that the manuscript was returned to the Associate Editor, who will peruse... papi papi capcut template link Nov 06, 2022 · Assignment: Miami Dade Collge Nurses Role and End Of Life Decisions Making Essay. Assignment: Miami Dade Collge Nurses Role and End Of Life Decisions Making Essay. Question Descri Editor assignment - After a manuscript passes the quality control check, it is assigned to an Academic Editor according to relevant expertise. The Academic ...Brett Halperin, Joshua M. Liao, Gary Hsieh & Katharina Reinecke Scientific Reports 12, Article number: 19987 ( 2022 ) Cite this article Metrics Abstract Despite the efficacy, safety, and...Background Polypharmacy can decrease medication adherence and increase the incidence of adverse drug reactions and drug-drug interactions, resulting in falls, hospitalisations and other complications especially in the elderly. Medication-related problems of polypharmacy can be prevented through patient-centred medication reviews but research in this area has been completed largely without ...The exploration of unknown environments is an essential application of multi-robot systems, particularly in critical missions, such as hazard detection and search and rescue. These missions share the need to reach full coverage of the explorable space in the shortest time possible. To minimize the completion time, robots in the fleet must be able to reliably exchange information about the ...Aquatic Ecology covers the ecology of fresh, brackish, estuarine and marine environments. The journal presents timely reports on fundamental and applied research in the field and the laboratory. It provides a forum for aquatic ecologists to address and evaluate ecological issues related to processes and structures at different integration levels.Nov 14, 2022 · The overall consistency of the three results after tilting was high, the results before and after tilting significantly differed, and the first, second, fifth, and sixth waves were shifted in the φ direction primarily because these positions were on the x-axis and the permanent magnets had obvious shifts. WebI submitted a review paper to a Springer-based journal. The various status updates are as follows. July 1: I made the initial submission. August 12: The status changed to Under Review. September 4: The status changed to Reviews Completed. September 15: I received a major revision decision. October 5: I submitted the revised manuscript. acca telford engineering answers 5 months is a really long time for a paper to be under the status of "Editor Assigned". Keep reminding the Editor about the status of your paper. If it still remains the same then withdraw it...Aquatic Ecology covers the ecology of fresh, brackish, estuarine and marine environments. The journal presents timely reports on fundamental and applied research in the field and the laboratory. It provides a forum for aquatic ecologists to address and evaluate ecological issues related to processes and structures at different integration levels.It depends on the editorial board of springer journal and the reviewers they choose to review the paper. Generally, the first answer is between 1 month to 6 months Cite 17th Jul, 2018 Virendra...Sept 16, 2021 ... However, there are often 2−3 editors sequentially assigned to your paper, and this timeframe may apply to each of them. Therefore, if your ... pure music Nov 08, 2022 · Aquatic Ecology covers the ecology of fresh, brackish, estuarine and marine environments. The journal presents timely reports on fundamental and applied research in the field and the laboratory. It provides a forum for aquatic ecologists to address and evaluate ecological issues related to processes and structures at different integration levels. ① Editor assigned 编辑指派. ② Editor Declined Invitation 该编辑拒绝邀请,这就会让主编不得不将投稿文章重新分派给其它编辑。 ③Decision Letter Being Prepared 就是编辑没找审稿人就自己决定了,一般情况下比较悲剧。一可能是英文太差,需要语言润色。二可能是内容太差。Experienced associate Professor with a demonstrated history of working in the researches about health. Skilled in Physical Therapy,cardiopulmonary disorders,geriatrics , rehabilitation and nursing.Have an experience in working as an editor and reviewer for more than 12 years in reputable journals ,and famous publishers such as Springer nature ,Taylor and Francis,Mark Allen,Lippincott Williams ...WebSep 16, 2021 · Are you a student at a higher institution or an early-career researcher who is striving to understand and master the peer review process so to increase the odds of getting a paper published in the Journal of Forestry Research or another reputable, peer-reviewed, scientific journal? In this paper, a young, senior editor provides a handbook of the peer review process based on his decadal ... The Ed. reviews it & forwards it to the Ed. Board (who happen to have a meeting that very day). The Ed. Board see your paper, agree it is impeccable & reach a rapid consensus to publish the... What does "Reviews Completed" status mean in Springer? It's waiting for the editor to read the reviews and make a decision. This could mean one of the following: 'reject', 'submit as new', 'major revision, 'minor revision' or 'accept' (Depending on the journal, options may change). Any decision above 'major revision' is good, meaning you get a ... used pec deck for sale Stage 1: Initial quality check This stage includes checks on authorship, competing interests, ethics approval and plagiarism. We oversee this process to ensure that your manuscript contains everything our editors and peer reviewers need to perform a fair and thorough assessment of your work. Stage 2: Editor assignedit timely to review the efficacy of MOX given the nearly two decades since its last review. Methods Search strategy and selection A systematic review was conducted to identify and analyse peer-review publicationsinvestigating the usage ofMOX in a Handling Editor: Una Ryan * Julie M. Old [email protected] select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal. search menu Journals Active JournalsThe overall consistency of the three results after tilting was high, the results before and after tilting significantly differed, and the first, second, fifth, and sixth waves were shifted in the φ direction primarily because these positions were on the x-axis and the permanent magnets had obvious shifts. radeon software WebEditor assignment pending after "review competed". publications journals journal-workflow. 12,896. It's not certain what it means without knowing the particulars of the journal's internal handling, but a likely meaning is that the paper has been handed off from the associate editor who has been handling the reviewing to a senior editor to ...Jul 01, 2014 · What does the status from required reviews completed back to editor assigned indicates? Question. 11 answers. Asked 28th Feb, 2022; Mohd Shariq; I have submitted my paper to one of the springer ... Jun 27, 2016 ... The last time I submitted to a Springer journal, it took about two to three months before being assigned to an editor and a full ten months post ...Devry HOSP330 Week 1 Discussion DQ 1& DQ 2 Latest 2015 NovemberDQ 1What type of events do event professionals manage? List some possible events that you have witnessed or in which you participated. Do you think they were well planned and managed? What made them special? What made them memorable? Challenge your classmates-did you attend […] click vinyl stair nosing The journal I used to work with had an average of 3–4 months, which was pretty good considering our process: first discussion with the editorial board, then sent to a referee (6–8 weeks) then (if that referee didn’t come through) possibly to a second referee, then back to the board. That takes time.The status "Editor Assigned" means that your paper has been assigned to an Associate Editor (AE) who will be in charge of it. The AE will do an initial screening of the manuscript to check its overall scientific value and match with the scope of the paper, after which the paper will either receive a desk rejection or be sent for peer review.The overall consistency of the three results after tilting was high, the results before and after tilting significantly differed, and the first, second, fifth, and sixth waves were shifted in the φ direction primarily because these positions were on the x-axis and the permanent magnets had obvious shifts. music genre questionnaire